Wizards are gay hussie

He had multiple blog.Lil post to appreciate characters:

• John was into computer coding even though he sucked at it, liked magic tricks, and other actors that were not Nic Cage. (As for his ‘true sexuality’, no notion what’s going on there. Hussie stated that Homestuck would reach a queer singularity, but John has canonically stated he is not gay. Idk.)
  
• Rose was messy as Hell. She wrote wizard fanfiction. She knitted. She was not always rational.
• Kanaya was not always prim and proper. She grew jealous of Vriska’s other relationships, and cut her off with no explanation, which did not help her any- considering she was her moirail, and was supposed to keep her in line. She thought Rose was a troll at first, when she only knew her as tentacleTherapist.
• Roxy could hack and code, liked science, and could fluently study morse code.
  
• Vriska was a pretty large history geek sometimes. She roleplayed as her ancestor, and tried to manipulate everybody into reenacting history. Her unpleasant relationships were, at times, the fault of others.
  
• Tavros raised a goddamn
  

  swamp-wizard:

  you know i never fucking thought id say this but i am less worried about how andrew hussie did/would potentially manage davekat (considering he gave us the gayest falling-in-love sequence ive ever seen and of course canonized the ship in the first place) than i am about coh*n ed*nfi*ld, even though he vowed to make his writing “ more qu**r”… considering he thinks jade is a part of dave and karkats romantic partnership and quickly backpedaled when people pointed out it was fucked up

  heres what my angle is: i have no investment in davekat as a “ship” at all. its not interesting to me. ive written about issues i have with the way their relationship was developed in hs canon before. this isnt me getting salty over a notp or lack of verification because im sad my otp didnt get together.

  what i AM invested in is the clear, explicit depiction of a well romantic relationship between men exclusively. what i AM invested in is seeing a bisexual character who struggles with his culture and compulsory heterosexuality and coming out of the closet end up with a man, in a world that overwhelmingly favors for bisexuals to bury their sam

  (Since Christmas is in the air, I thought it would be a nice time for a redux of this article posted in my old blog. It is probably the only thing worth salvaging from that blog and in this season of sharing I feel it is important to disseminate it with you.)
  
  I dislike Fancy-Santas. Unlike the archetypical Santa, the cliché with the bright red suit, white beard, and unassuming accessories like black boots and mittens, the Fancy-Santa tries to be more than the cliché. He drapes himself in ruffled velvets, expensive European leathers, peculiar hats, and often can be found carrying around armloads of weird things, like a wreath, or a swan, or a fucking bush.
  
  But what’s worse is his attitude. The Fancy-Santa acts enjoy he’s too good to be a normal Santa. While a normal Santa is jolly and warm, the Fancy-Santa is detached and acts like a complete prick. He likes to think he’s mysterious, tiptoeing through the woods, occasionally pausing to cast an abstract gaze into the northern sky. What mortal could dare to even fathom the grand majesties behind his ice-blue eyes and gaudy attire? What mortal could give one of his bullshit dolls or figurines?
  
  You’ve probably seen

  

  Gay Narratives and Andrew Hussie’s “Alternia”

  In which I tackle troll gender, binary attractive models, gay narratives, and their metatextual implications. An essay in three parts:

  i. Alternia: Bisexual, Binormative, or Something Else?

  ii. Allegorically Gay: The Problem of “Transcending the Quadrants”

  iii. The Metanarrative: What Does It Represent to be Gay?
  

  i. Alternia: Bisexual, Binormative, or Something Else? 
  

  The establishment of trolls as a “bisexual” species raises questions about the accuracy of the designation, especially given that species complex enough to grow conceptions of gender are unlikely to conform to single attraction models. Given that trolls are supposedly the prototype for humans, the “heterosexual” human is presumed to be a derivative of the multi-attracted troll. As such, we have statements like this: “for humans reproductive relationships are exclusively heterosexual, and for trolls they are 8isexual” (007907, pp.11). The problem is that this claim, despite having been ostensibly delivered by one of the most well-informed trolls on the subject, is nonsense. How is a reproductive